|
| This article is part of the supplement: Abstracts of the Ninth International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection . Poster presentationInfluence of gender in predicting CCR5 coreceptor usageSan Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
from Ninth International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection Journal of the International AIDS Society 2008, 11(Suppl 1):P202doi:10.1186/1758-2652-11-S1-P202 The electronic version of this abstract is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.jiasociety.org/content/11/S1/P202
© 2008 Nozza et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Purpose of the studyFactors associated with CCR5 coreceptor usage are not yet extensively evaluated; in some studies high CD4 and low viremia have been considered predictive [1,2]. We evaluated factors predicting the viral tropism in failing patients with long exposure to HIV, screened for Maraviroc Expanded Access Program (A4001050) at San Raffaele Hospital. MethodsViral tropism was determined in 98/116 (84%) (ViroLogic PhenoSense assay). Viral tropism was classified as R5, D/M or X4 for virus that used CCR5 coreceptor, CCR5 and CXCR4 coreceptors or CXCR4 coreceptor, respectively. Variables evaluated for the association with the R5 virus (outcome variable) were: age, gender, CDC stage (C vs. A and B), screening CD4 percentage, CD4+ cells, HIV-1 plasma RNA level, nadir CD4+, risk factor (IVDU vs. other), time since HIV infection. All these characteristics were considered at univariable and multivariable analysis. Logistic regression was applied at multivariable analysis. Data were described as median (Q1–Q3) or frequency (%), as appropriate. Summary of results56 (57.1%) patients had R5 virus, 40 (40.1%) had D/M virus, two (4.1%) had X4 virus; only R5 and D/M groups were considered for this analysis; 82 (85.4%) were males, age 45.7 (42.6–50.8) years; 15 (19.5%) were IVDU, HIV exposure 15.8 (12.7–18.7) years, 41 (43%) had a C CDC stage. Screening characteristics were: CD4 240 cells/cmm (133–364); CD4% 12.7(8.6–19.2); HIV-RNAlog10 copies/mL 4.31(3.82–4.94). Female were more likely to have D/M virus [10/14 (71%) vs. 30/82 (37%) ; p = 0.0195]. The D/M group had a significantly lower screening CD4+ cells percentage than R5 group (11.0% (7.3–17.8) vs. 15.3% (9.4–20.6); p = 0.055). No other differences on the screening characteristics were found in relation to coreceptor usage (age: p = 0.296; HIV-1 plasma RNA level: p = 0.855; nadir CD4+: p = 0.070; CD4+: p = 0.079; CDC stage: p = 0.202; risk factor of HIV transmission: p = 0.574, HIV exposure: p = 0.907). Among the screening characteristics up-reported, multivariable analysis showed that females rather than males [OR = 0.124 95% CI: 0.021–0.558; p = 0.011] and patients with CD4% <12.85 (median value) [OR = 0.275 95%CI: 0.077–0.875; p = 0.035 ] were less likely to harbour R5 virus. ConclusionOur study underlines the possibility for gender to influence not only the initial viral set-point as previously shown [3], but also the probability of harbouring R5 viruses. References
Have something to say? Post a comment on this article! |




on Google Scholar







corresponding author email