|
| This article is part of the supplement: Abstracts of the Ninth International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection . Poster presentationTherapeutic drug monitoring of new formulation Kaletra in pregnancy1 The Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland 2 Department of Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK 3 The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland 4 University College Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland 5 The Rotunda Hospital, The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital and University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
from Ninth International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection Journal of the International AIDS Society 2008, 11(Suppl 1):P199doi:10.1186/1758-2652-11-S1-P199 The electronic version of this abstract is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.jiasociety.org/content/11/S1/P199
© 2008 Jackson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Purpose of the studyThe new LPV/r tablet formulation has significant patient benefits over the old LPV/r SGC, including a lack of food/fluid restrictions, no need for refrigeration and a reduced daily pill count. However, like many antiretroviral drugs, the pharmacokinetics of the new LPV/r tablet during pregnancy is poorly understood. Here we report total and unbound LPV plasma concentrations during pregnancy and at post-partum. MethodsIn this prospective, open-labelled study, pregnant HIV-positive patients received the LPV/r tablet formulation as part of their routine pre-natal care. Demographic and clinical data were collected and LPV plasma (total) and ultrafiltrate (unbound) concentrations were determined in the first (T1) and/or second (T2) and/or third (T3) trimester using HPLC-MS/MS. Post-partum (PP) sampling was performed where applicable. Ante-partum and post-partum PK parameters were compared using a one-way ANOVA (for independent data sets) and a paired t-test (for paired data). Summary of resultsFrom January 2007, 33 women were enrolled in the study; 31/33 received LPV/r tablet at the standard dose of 2 tablets BID. The remaining two patients were prescribed 4 tablets OD and 3 tablets BID, respectively. 30/33 women initiated LPV/r treatment during pregnancy. Median gestation at initiation was 25 weeks. 3/33 women were receiving HAART prior to pregnancy. Median baseline CD4 count was 349 (14–836). Median baseline viral load was 9,100 copies/ml (<50–267,408). LPV/r (total and unbound) concentrations were determined in 1/33 (T1); 10/33 (T2); 29/33 (T3) and 8/33 (PP) (≤12 weeks) patients. 2/10 patients at T2 and 3/29 patients at T3 fell below the recommended LPV MEC (<1000 ng/ml), respectively. Median total LPV concentrations at T2 and T3 were 2770 ng/ml (1759–4202) and 3371 ng/ml (2331–4310), respectively; and were significantly lower relative to LPV concentrations observed at PP [5352 ng/ml (2667–7293)] (p = 0.042). Equally, in a paired analysis of eight patients (T3 vs. PP), total LPV concentrations were significantly reduced at T3 vs. PP (p = 0.021). However, no significant difference was observed in the % unbound LPV at T3 [0.93% (0.71–1.10)] vs. PP [0.96% (0.81–1.19)]. ConclusionStandard dosage of LPV/r during pregnancy resulted in adequate therapeutic drug levels in the majority women examined. In addition, the similarities in the percentage of unbound LPV in the third trimester versus post-partum suggest that the standard dose of LPV/r is appropriate during pregnancy. Further research into this is required. Have something to say? Post a comment on this article! |




on Google Scholar







corresponding author email